HCPLive Network

Can We Induce Patients and PCPs to Execute Advance Directives?

This article originally appeared online at DrPullen.com, part of the HCPLive network.

You Get What You Pay For
Primary care physicians have come under criticism because they have not counseled their patients and encouraged them to execute an advance directive and a medical durable power of attorney. This is felt to be a factor in the leading to the large percentage of the dollars spent by Medicare in the last year, and especially in the last few days of life. There is pretty good data that appropriate use of hospice leads to both a higher patient satisfaction and lower costs than control groups of patients who do not use hospice in their last months and weeks. So given this, why doesn’t every patient come to their physician and demand to discuss end of life issues, and why doesn’t every primary care physician strongly encourage their patients to consider executing an advance directive and a medical durable power of attorney? It’s really pretty simple. Our health care reimbursement system gets exactly what it incentivizes.

If a senior patient chooses to make an appointment with their physician at any time other than at their Welcome to Medicare exam (a visit where since 2009 for a modest payment their physician is supposed to do a complete history, physical exam, EKG, discuss end of life issues and give counsel about advance directives and medical durable power of attorney) the patient is faced with paying the copayment and deductible portion of the fee for the visit, and the physician up until the current health care reform has not been able to bill specifically for these services. This has just been considered a minor detail to lump into a visit for hypertension, diabetes, or whatever else brings the patient to the physician.

It really would be quite simple to vastly increase the number of seniors with completed advance directives and medical DPAs. Just make it financially advantageous for patients to make this a part of a physician visit periodically, maybe every 5 years or more often if certain new diagnoses are made, and compensate the physician well enough that physicians will bring the subject up during visits. This could be as simple as making these visits fully paid for by Medicare (no copay, no deductible) if the visit includes counsel about advance directives and medical DPA, and the patient agrees to executes an advance directive and name someone as their medical DPA within 30 days of the visit. Also create a billing code to add to these visits such that the physician is paid 25% extra for the visit during which the counseling takes place. Allow this incentive only for outpatient visits. Once the patient is at the hospital it’s really too late to effectively accomplish much of the benefit of advance directives and medical DPAs. If this policy leads to a large majority of Medicare patients maintaining a current advance directive and naming someone as having their medical DPA, it could save big sums of money by avoiding the days in hospital ICU beds used by families to work through these issues, often without valid input from the patient involved. It might also increase use of hospice at appropriate times, leading to yet further savings. In addition it is incentivizing patients and physicians to address these issues before crisis is at hand. Even if there is no savings, it incentivizes both patients and primary care physicians to tackle this topic early and regularly.

There may be a better way to incentivize patients to execute advance directives and designate a medical DPA, and I’m all for someone thinking of a better way to do this, but most Americans are bright enough and frugal enough to take advantage of financial incentives, and I suspect most primary care physicians are too.

For any interested patients here is a link to a resource for all 50 states for advance directives.

Ed Pullen, MD, is a board-certified family physician practicing in Puyallup, WA. He blogs at DrPullen.com – A Medical Bog for the Informed Patient.

Further Reading
Taking iron supplements as prescribed may play a role in reducing the risk of having a child with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), according to research published online Sept. 22 in the American Journal of Epidemiology.
Approximately one in 15 family physicians spend at least 80% of their time in emergency or urgent care, with higher percentages seen for doctors in rural areas, according to a report published by the American Academy of Family Physicians. The findings were published in the July-August issue of the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.
Americans’ view of the US healthcare system continues to fall, according to a survey from the Employee Benefit Research Institute.
As more studies have demonstrated potential therapeutic applications for marijuana, public opinion regarding medical and recreational marijuana use has shifted. One such study recently published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology revealed medical marijuana is potentially beneficial for digestive disorders and gastrointestinal symptoms.
Enterovirus-D68 could soon be in the rearview mirror, according to a Hartford, CT, pediatric intensivist who has treated more than 20 children hospitalized with the infection. “We may have plateaued,” said Christopher Carroll, MD, an asthma specialist at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center. While children are still being admitted for respiratory problems, “Now it’s more a mix of symptoms, not those of classic enterovirus.” Though he could not say for certain the outbreak has peaked, he did say that “things are not continuing to get worse.”
The World Health Organization continued its efforts to battle the ongoing Ebola outbreak with a second meeting of its Emergency Committee tackling the virus.
Counseling at-risk teens and adults to change risky behavior is an effective way to reduce the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, according to the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). The group is updating its guidelines for primary care physicians to recommend they offer appropriate patients such behavioral advice. The task force also calls for routine screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea for sexually active teens and women up to age 24. Older women who are pregnant or may be at risk of infection due to a variety of sexual behaviors—such as having multiple partners or exchanging sex for money or drugs—should also be screened, the USPSTF said.
More Reading