HCPLive Network

Immunogenicity Strongly Impacts Response to Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis

 
THURSDAY, Dec. 13 (HealthDay News) -- For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), long-term clinical outcomes are good with etanercept and adalimumab; but for adalimumab, treatment response is strongly dependent on the presence or absence of anti-adalimumab antibodies, according to research published in the December issue of Arthritis & Rheumatism.

Charlotte L. Krieckaert, M.D., of the Jan van Breemen Research Institute in Amsterdam, and colleagues conducted a study involving 407 patients with RA who were naive to tumor necrosis factor antagonists and received either etanercept (203 patients) or adalimumab (204 patients).

The researchers found that, of the adalimumab group, 13, 15, and 16 percent, respectively, reached sustained low disease activity, sustained minimal disease activity, and sustained American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism remission. The corresponding rates were 16, 11, and 12 percent in the etanercept group. The best outcomes were seen for adalimumab-treated patients without anti-adalimumab antibodies; the worst outcomes were seen for those with anti-adalimumab antibodies; and intermediate outcomes were seen for etanercept-treated patients. At least sustained minimal disease activity was seen for 40 percent of patients without anti-adalimumab antibodies; 23 percent of etanercept-treated patients; and 4 percent of patients with anti-adalimumab antibodies.

"Overall, etanercept and adalimumab treatment appear similar in inducing a good long-term clinical outcome," the authors write. "However, in the case of adalimumab this is strongly dependent on the presence or absence of anti-adalimumab antibodies."

Several authors disclosed financial ties to pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer (Wyeth) and Abbott Laboratories, both of which partially funded the study.
 

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

 
Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
 
 
 

Further Reading
Assessment of long-term data on treatment utility demonstrates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate for multiple sclerosis.
Treatment with Sativex oromucosal spray produces significant reductions in spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) compared with placebo, but researchers reported no significant difference between the two in neurophysiologic measures.
Results from the RADIANCE study show that treatment with the selective S1P1 receptor modulator RPC1063 is associated with significant reductions in GD-enhancing lesions on MRI, as well as new or enlarging T2 lesions, compared with placebo.
Patients treated for two years with a combination of glatiramer acetate and estriol experienced a one-third reduction in relapse rate compared with patients who received glatiramer acetate and placebo.
Patients with multiple sclerosis who received thrice-weekly injections of glatiramer acetate 40 mg/ml reported increased satisfaction with their treatment and experienced lower rates of moderate and severe injections site reactions and other adverse events.
Five-year data from the ENDORSE study shows that patients with multiple sclerosis who continued treatment, or who switched from another medication, experienced improved NEDA outcomes.
Mikkel Anthonisan, MD, highlights his experience as the founder of Oceans of Hope, a global voyage to change the perception of multiple sclerosis, at the 2014 Joint ACTRIMS-ECTRIMS Meeting.
More Reading