- Revenue Cycle Management
- COVID-19
- Reimbursement
- Diabetes Awareness Month
- Risk Management
- Patient Retention
- Staffing
- Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
- Coding and documentation
- Business of Endocrinology
- Telehealth
- Physicians Financial News
- Cybersecurity
- Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
- Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
- Weight Management
- Business of Women's Health
- Practice Efficiency
- Finance and Wealth
- EHRs
- Remote Patient Monitoring
- Sponsored Webinars
- Medical Technology
- Billing and collections
- Acute Pain Management
- Exclusive Content
- Value-based Care
- Business of Pediatrics
- Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
- Practice Growth
- Concierge Medicine
- Business of Cardiology
- Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
- Malpractice
- Influenza
- Sexual Health
- Chronic Conditions
- Technology
- Legal and Policy
- Money
- Opinion
- Vaccines
- Practice Management
- Patient Relations
- Careers
What If EMRs Were Classified as Medical Devices?
Electronic Medical Records aren't considered medical devices by government agencies. If they were, the products currently on the market might have trouble getting approved.
a medical device is "an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including a component part, or accessory which is:
• recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to them,
• intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or
• intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of any of its primary intended purposes."
Also, the agency has issued a guidance document differentiating a mobile medical app from a medical device. Electronic medical records, at least in their present form, are unlikely to be interpreted to be medical devices. But, what about the future? What if next-generation EMRs have deep intelligence and decision support, advising treatment using DIY medical apps? What would be the regulatory implications, given that:
1. They are not safe now. They contribute to significant medical errors and might require a black box warning.
2. They are not secure.
3. They are not effective.
4. They would probably require a 510 (k) approval. New applications might be so new they require a PMA process for approval.
5. They are not user friendly.
6. The do not achieve their intended use.
7. They have not been demonstrated to be cost effective.
8. They do not come with proper labeling or a product insert.
9. There are no instruction manuals.
10. It is hard to find replacement parts.
CEOs of companies that make electronic medical records as medical devices would be getting cease and desist letters from the FDA. Maybe it's time to call a preventive moratorium on their use before we get to that point.
