James E. Wiedeman, MD
Associate Professor of Surgery
Department of Surgery
University of California Davis
Chief
Department of General Surgery
Sacramento VA Medical Center
Sacramento, CA
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Surgeons are frequently asked to evaluate patients who experience chronic pain and have normal or equivocal findings on physical examination or imaging studies. It is important for surgeons to have a clear understanding of the indications for operative intervention in these patients.
Results and discussion: An algorithmic management approach is presented for groin, anal, breast, and right upper quadrant abdominal pain in patients whose clinical findings are ambiguous.
Conclusion: Occult hernias and nonthrombosed hemorrhoids rarely cause pain, and other causes of the patient?s groin or anal pain should be investigated. In those with mastalgia, breast cancer must always be ruled out; once it is, reassurance is usually sufficient treatment. Patients who experience right upper quadrant abdominal pain and have a normal biliary ultrasound may benefit from cholecystectomy.
Many surgeons quickly dismiss
chronic pain patients as malingerers
when objective findings
fail to correlate with the patients' perceived
level of pain. Rather than sending
these patients straight back to their referring
providers, surgeons can apply basic
algorithms to ensure serious pathology is
not missed and to determine whether surgery
is indicated. Management can range
from simple reassurance to a carefully
planned operation. What follows is an
approach for algorithmic management of
groin, anal, breast, and right upper quadrant
abdominal pain in patients who have
unclear clinical findings.
GROIN PAIN
Most nonsurgeons ascribe groin pain
to an inguinal hernia even if the physical
examination is inconclusive. Patients may
be convinced even before their surgical
consultation that a simple operation is all
they need to alleviate the pain. When no
inguinal hernia is identified, it frustrates
both patient and surgeon.
Many patients who are referred to
surgeons for chronic groin pain have
undergone inguinal hernia surgery previously.
Thirty percent or more of patients
who have undergone hernia surgery experience
groin discomfort 1 year postoperatively.1 In the majority of these cases,
no recurrent hernia is identified, and the
etiology of the pain is poorly understood.
Nerve entrapment or mesh inguinodynia
have been incriminated, and a systematic
approach of nerve blocks, triple neurectomy
(ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and
genital branch of genitofemoral), and
mesh removal has had variable success.2,3
Fortunately, reassurance that no hernia
is present and that the condition is not
medically dangerous is all many patients
need. It is unwise to re-explore a groin to
look for a hernia.
Patients also can develop chronic groin
pain without having undergone previous
groin operations. Occult hernias are often suggested
as the cause of groin pain, but reducible hernias
rarely cause much pain. While occult hernias can be
diagnosed using computed tomography, ultrasonography,
or herniography, the significance of finding a
small hernia on these examinations must be questioned.
The best way to rule out an occult inguinal
hernia is via transabdominal laparoscopic exploration.
Laparoscopy is also a reasonable procedure
to offer patients who report a history of a groin bulge
but in whom no such bulge is palpable on physical
examination.
Lumbosacral spine and
hip pathology, such as disc
protrusion, vertebral spondilosis,
and degenerative
arthritis, can be found in up
to 50% of patients with
groin pain and no previous
hernias.4 Magnetic resonance
imaging and neurosurgery
or an orthopedic referral
should be considered
before performing more invasive
interventions.
Sports "hernias" are wellknown
among professional
athletes, particularly hockey
players when the conjoint
tendon or the external oblique muscle is torn, which
can result in nerve entrapment in 82% of cases.5 These
patients may subsequently benefit from surgical intervention
or trials of nerve blocks (Figure).
ANAL PAIN
According to the layman and many referring physicians,
anal pain is usually attributable to hemorrhoids.
In actuality, internal hemorrhoids cause pain only
if they are incarcerated (fourth-degree prolapse),
and external hemorrhoids are painful only if thrombosed.
Both conditions will be evident on physical
examination. A nonthrombosed external skin tag
or minimal prolapsing hemorrhoid should not be excised
with the expectation that a patient's anal pain
will be alleviated.
An occult anal fissure is the most common etiology
of undiagnosed anal pain. Anal fissures may be
extremely difficult to see on physical examination in
patients with deep gluteal clefts or spastic internal
sphincters. Often the only sign is exquisite focal
tenderness to precise circumferential anal palpation.
Deep anorectal abscesses may also demonstrate
minimal external findings, and closer examination
with the patient under anesthesia may be needed to
make a diagnosis. Topical nitroglycerin ointment
(0.2%) is a safe treatment for patients thought to
have an anal fissure and spastic sphincter, even
when those findings cannot be confirmed on physical
examination.6
Other causes of anorectal pain, such as proctalgia
fugax or coccygodynia, should be considered if more
clear-cut etiologies are not apparent. Unfortunately, up
to 50% of patients with intractable anorectal pain of
poorly understood etiology are refractory to all treatment
modalities (Figure).7
BREAST PAIN (MASTALGIA)
The etiology of breast pain is often poorly understood
but frequently labeled as "fibrocystic breast disease,"
which is more appropriately termed "fibrocystic
breast disorder." Pathology can include cyst
formation, epithelial hyperplasia, metaplasia, and
adenosis. Although a malignancy is usually painless, it
must be carefully excluded as a possibility in any
woman with breast pain. Mammography and ultrasonography,
coupled with careful clinical examination,
should help establish whether biopsy is needed.
Suspicious radiographic lesions or dominant breast
masses on physical examination warrant biopsy regardless
of the patient's symptoms. Open biopsy or
fine-needle aspiration of a tender area of the breast
that has no radiographic or palpable lesions of significance
is clearly not indicated. Simple reassurance that
no cancer is present is all that 85% of patients with
mastalgia need.8 More extensive surgery for mastalgia,
such as subcutaneous mastectomy, quadrantectomy,
or simple mastectomy, should be considered in only a
minority of patients, because fewer than 50% will get
relief from such procedures.9
Effective medical measures for mastalgia include
use of a properly fitting bra; decreasing dietary fat and
caffeine intake; and the administration of evening
primrose oil, followed by danazol, bromocriptine, or
tamoxifen. The significant side effects of some of the
latter treatments, however, may outweigh any benefits.
Ineffective treatments include vitamins A, B, or E,
diuretics, levothyroxine, antibiotics, and surgery
(Figure).10
RIGHT UPPER QUADRANT ABDOMINAL PAIN
Practice Point
Before considering cholecystectomy, it is important to rule out other upper gastrointestinal pathology.
The term "biliary dyskinesia" was coined in
1953. At the time, a 60% improvement rate following
cholecystectomy was reported for this poorly
understood disease. Severe
biliary colic in the absence
of gallstones is a real entity;
however, it is difficult
to determine who will
benefit from cholecystectomy.
Once ultrasonography
has ruled out gallstones, the
most commonly used test is the CCK-HIDA (cholecystokinin-
99mTc hepatoiminodiacetic acid) scan,
which assesses biliary function by measuring the
gallbladder ejection fraction (EF). An EF below
35% is considered abnormal. A number of retrospective
studies suggest that biliary colic symptoms
improve in 60% to 100% of patients with a gallbladder
EF below 35% who undergo cholecystectomy.11,12 Another study suggests that even those who
have an EF above 35% may experience a 75%
improvement in their symptoms 36 months following
cholecystectomy.13
Before considering cholecystectomy, it is important
to rule out other upper gastrointestinal pathology.
This can be done using upper endoscopy or radiographic
contrast studies. More complex studies
are rarely productive, such as evaluating for biliary
crystals using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
(ERCP) or performing sphincter of
Oddi manometry.
Patients may believe that simple gallbladder surgery
will cure their condition. The number of cholecystectomies
increased by 29% from 1986 to 1995,
which coincides with the advent of a laparoscopic
approach.14 Surgeons must not lower the clinical requirements
for performing this procedure simply
because the patient or the patient's referring physician
perceives it to be safer (Figure).
CONCLUSION
The wise surgical dictum "never operate for
pain" can prevent misery from the surgeon's perspective.
Patients with poorly understood pain syndromes
involving the groin, anus, breast, and right
upper abdominal quadrant, however, must be completely
evaluated to exclude surgically correctable
pathology or medically manageable problems. In
these cases, surgeons should remember three important
points: (1) occult hernias and nonthrombosed
hemorrhoids rarely cause pain; (2) mastalgia cannot
be cured surgically, and breast cancer must always
be ruled out in these patients; (3) a select group of
patients with right upper quadrant abdominal pain
and a normal biliary ultrasound will benefit from
cholecystectomy.
Disclosure
The authors have no relationship with any commercial entity that might represent a conflict of interest with the content of this article and attest that the data meet the requirements for informed consent and for the Institutional Review Boards.
References
- Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg. 2001;233(1):1-7.
- Amid PK. A 1-stage surgical treatment for postherniorrhaphy neuropathic pain: triple neurectomy and proximal end implantation without mobilization of the cord. Arch Surg. 2002;137(1):100-104.
- Heise CP, Starling JR. Mesh inguinodynia: a new clinical syndrome after inguinal herniorrhaphy? J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187(5):514-518.
- Deysine M, Deysine GR, Reed WP. Groin pain in the absence of hernia; a new syndrome. Hernia. 2002;6(2):64-67.
- Irshad K, Feldman LS, Lavoie C, et al. Operative management of "hockey groin syndrome": 12 years of experience in National Hockey League players. Surgery. 2001;130(4):759-764.
- Vincent C. Anorectal pain and irritation: anal fissure, levator syndrome, proctalgia fugax and pruitis ani. Prim Care. 1999;26(1):53-68.
- Ger GC, Wexner SD, Jorge JM, et al. Evaluation and treatment of chronic intractable rectal pain—a frustrating endeavor. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(2):139-145.
- Holland PA, Gateley CA. Drug therapy of mastalgia. What are the options? Drugs. 1994;48(5):709-716.
- Davies EL, Cochrane RA, Stansfield K, et al. Is there a role for surgery in the treatment of mastalgia? Breast. 1999;8(5):285-288.
- BeLieu RM. Mastodynia. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1994;21 (3):461-477.
- Yost F, Margenthaler J, Presti M, et al. Cholecystectomy is an effective treatment for biliary dyskinesia. Am J Surg. 1999;178(6):462-465.
- Patel NA, Lamb JJ, Hogle NJ, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of biliary dyskinesia. Am J Surg. 2004;187(2):209-212.
- Fuller RA, Kuhn JA, Fisher TL, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acalculous gallbladder disease. BUMC Proceedings. 2000;13:331-333.
- Johanning JM, Gruenberg JC. The changing face of cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 1998;64(7):643-647.