HCPLive Network
PERSONAL FINANCE

The Taxes on Your Lottery Win

Laura Joszt | Friday, March 30, 2012
If you live in the U.S., you might have heard that the Mega Millions jackpot is an astoundingly high $640 million. With a jackpot that big, people are lining up to buy tickets even though their chances of winning are just one in 175 million.

Most already know that the lucky winner has to choose between receiving the money either as a one-time payment or through installments. But in addition to winning, ticket buyers are basically lining up to pay taxes. And it matters a lot where you buy your lottery tickets.

“As with wage income, some amount of lottery winnings is withheld for the government before you calculate your total tax bill when filing your income tax the following year,” the Tax Foundation wrote. In addition to the 25% federal withholding tax, the winner(s) will find their winnings are subject to state income tax. And those tax rates vary widely (see chart below).

“States rely heavily on lottery revenue, collecting an average of $58 per person in ‘profit’ aside from any income tax collections,” according to the Tax Foundation. That profit is considered an implicit tax.


The states making the most in profits per capita are:

 


1. Delaware - $370

2. Rhode Island - $324

3. West Virginia - $314

4. South Dakota - $145

5. Oregon - $142

6. New York - $138

7. Massachusetts - $137

8. Arkansas - $124

9. New Jersey - $105

10. Georgia - $92


North Dakota makes the least per capita with only $9.

There are seven states with no lottery — Alabama, Alaska, Hawaii, Mississippi, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming — so those residents will have to cross state lines to try their luck.

Residents of Utah and Nevada might not want to go south, though. Arizona’s withholding tax is 6% for non-residents while only being 5% for residents. But then, going north to Idaho or Oregon isn’t exactly appealing since their rates are even higher at 7.8% and 8%, respectively. But California is perfect as only one of three states with no withholding tax rate.

Other states with no withholding rate are Delaware and Pennsylvania. Plus, six states have no income tax: Florida, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Washington.

The highest withholding tax rate? That honor goes to the residents of New York City. The state’s rate is only 8.97%, but there’s an additional 3.648% for people in the city. Otherwise that honor goes to New Jersey, whose taxes are notoriously high. The Garden State will take a whopping 10.8% of your winnings.

Reuters
reported that if no one wins on Friday night, “lottery officials are considering moving the next drawing to Times Square in New York City as the anticipation and the jackpot build.”




RELATED ARTICLES
The true cost of Obamacare was recently revealed in the pages of a new Congressional Budget Office report. The total bill for the president’s program is estimated to reach $1.9 trillion over the next 10 years.
The US economy is growing at a pace not seen in the last decade, yet the stock market is caught in a web of uncertainty that has little chance of clearing up in the months ahead. In such times, the prudent choice is to stick with quality stocks like these.
Big data is increasingly having an impact on the way physicians practice medicine. Now a new tool is leveraging crowdsourced data to help doctors make smarter career choices.
RECENT CLINICAL ARTICLES
The self-described naturopath who made millions after his dubious weight-loss product was touted as “magic” on “The Dr. Oz Show” has agreed to a multimillion-dollar settlement with the Federal Trade Commission.
Everyone involved in the care of a child diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) wants to know that child’s long-term prognosis. In a study in JAMA Psychiatry Peter Szatmari, MD reports on his study of 421 newly diagnosed preschoolers in a Canadian multisite longitudinal study. Data were collected over 4 years, until each child was age 6.The author found that there are several trajectories ASD can take.
For patients seen in emergency departments solely for chest pain not due to myocardial infarction, noninvasive screening tests for coronary heart disease do not appear to benefit the prediction of future cardiovascular events, a new study suggests. The report was published online Jan. 26 in JAMA Internal Medicine.