
FDA Issues Complete Response Letter for VP-102 for Molluscum
The FDA is looking for more information regarding aspects of the chemistry, manufacturing, and controls process for the drug-device combination
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a Complete Response Letter to Verrica Pharmaceuticals for its New Drug Application for VP-102, an investigational, proprietary, drug-device combination for the treatment of
In the letter, the FDA notes it is looking for more information regarding aspects of the chemistry, manufacturing, and controls process for the drug-device combination. The agency is also seeking Human Factors validation. There were no clinical deficiencies identified in the Complete Response Letter.
Verrica Pharmaceuticals, a dermatology therapeutics company, will request a Type A meeting to discuss the issues presented in the Complete Response Letter and to learn the steps needed to resubmit the New Drug Application for VP-102.
“We are confident that we can work closely with the FDA to fully address the issues raised in the letter and we continue to believe VP-102 remains viable for FDA approval,” Ted White, president and chief executive officer of Verrica, said in
In 2 double-blind, phase 3 trials, CAMP-1 and CAMP-2, investigators evaluated VP-102 compared to placebo in patients at least 2 years old who were diagnosed with molluscum. The results demonstrated favorable safety, efficacy, and tolerability.
Results from CAMP-1 and CAMP-2 showed 46% and 54%, respectively, of those treated with VP-102 achieved complete clearance of all baseline and new molluscum lesions at the end of the trials compared to 18% and 13%, respectively, of those in the placebo groups (P <.0001).
There were no serious adverse events reported, while any adverse events noted by subjects were mild-to-severe local skin reactions.
“We look forward to providing updates on our progress toward resubmitting our (New Drug Application) for VP-102 as quickly as possible,” White said.
The company previously received a letter from the agency which mentioned deficiencies that precluded discussion of labeling and post-marketing requirements and commitments.








































































