World Health Organization review finds that consumption of fish oil supplements have little to no impact on development or diagnosis of diabetes.
Lee Hooper, PhD
A new review commissioned by the World Health Organization has found increased consumption of omega-3 fats and fish oil supplements offer no benefit in terms of protecting or reversing type 2 diabetes.
After examining more than 80 randomized trials that included more than 120,000 participants, investigators from the University of East Anglia discovered that people randomized to consume more fish oils had the same risk of diagnosis as the control group.
With previous research indicating fish oil supplements have no impact on conditions such as cardiovascular disease, investigators sought to determine whether increased alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), long-chain omega-3 (LCn3) , omega-6, and total polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) had an impact on diabetes diagnosis and glucose metabolism.
For the review, investigators included randomized controlled trials — both published and unpublished — comparing higher with lower consumption for 24 weeks or more that assessed for the review’s primary outcomes. Primary outcomes for the review included a new diagnosis of diabetes, new diagnosis of pre-diabetes, glycemic control, and insulin and insulin resistance.
Studies included also needed to collect data on fasting glucose or insulin, HbA1c and/or homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).
Investigators performed statistical analyses that included random-effects meta-analyses using relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) analyses. Subgroup assessments were executed evaluating different intervention types, replacement, baseline diabetes risk, use of diabetes medications, trial duration, and dosage.
Of the trials included, 41 were conducted in Europe, 16 in North America, 3 in South America, 15 in Asia, and 6 in Australia. Additionally, 2 trials were conducted across multiple continents.
A total of 66 trials assessed the effects of LCn3, of which investigators identified 10 as being of low risk of bias. Impact of LCn3 was analyzed in 58643 patients — of which, 3.7% developed diabetes — and investigators found LCn3 had little to no effect on likelihood of diabetes diagnosis (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.17) or measures of glucose metabolism (HbA1c MD -0.02%, -0.07 to 0.04; plasma glucose MD 0.04 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.07; fasting insulin MD 1.02 pmol/L, 95% CI -4.34 to 6.37; HOMA-IR MD 0.06, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.33).
Investigators noted they were unable to determine the effects of ALA, omega-6, and total PUFA on diabetes diagnosis as results were unclear due to what they considered “very low-quality” evidence. Additionally, analysis revealed little to no effect on measures of glucose metabolism except that increasing ALA could result in an increase in fasting insulin.
Investigators found no evidence that the omega-3 to omega-6 ratio was important for diabetes or glucose metabolism. They also noted. There was a suggestion of negatives outcomes when supplement LCn3 dose was greater than 4.4 grams per day.
"This large systematic review included information from many thousands of people over long periods. Despite all this information, we don't see protective effects,” said lead investigator Lee Hooper, PhD, from the University of East Anglia Norwich Medical School. ”The most trustworthy studies consistently showed little or no effect of long-chain omega 3 fats on diabetes."
This study, “Omega-3, omega-6 and total dietary polyunsaturated fat for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review & meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials,” was published online in the British Medical Journal.