The Short Shrift of Healthcare: Managed Care Organizations Practicing Medicine (Without a License)


To improve the insurance coverage of mental healthcare, employers and group health plans are ruled against discrimination (ie, providing less coverage for mental health conditions than physical ones).

Just today in pediatrics, Aetna refused to pay for a visit of a child with a probable goiter and strong family history who needed diagnostic lab tests—they do not accept rule-outs. Last week Oxford levied a $50 deductible and $25 co-pay for the most efficacious eardrop we have in our armamentarium; reason? This drop, containing an antibiotic and a steroid was not available generically; they were forcing me to use a plain eardrop — not what the doctor ordered!

Mental Health Parity; Let the HMO's Be Damned!

To improve the insurance coverage of mental healthcare, employers and group health plans are ruled against discrimination, * ie, providing less coverage for mental health conditions than physical ones.

Note: this rule was originally approved in 2008 and it will finally become law in July 2010. "The administration said the new requirements could increase premiums by four-tenths of 1 percent, or $25.6 billion over 10 years. Businesses with 50 or fewer employees are exempt."

  • However, under it, insurers can still second guess practitioners and challenge payment for lack of “medical necessity.” This is shameful on its face as any practitioner can attest—the patient is often in crisis, demanding treatment that is uncomfortable for the average doctor because of poly-pharmacy, black-box warnings on meds, and the unpredictable nature of mental illness itself.
  • Then there's the insidious fear of litigation.
  • And Delays Patients do not always know when they're not going to be able to cope or when they are on the 'slippery slope' of a breakdown. Compounding this is the stigma of mental illness that itself contributes to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Enter managed care with its hurdles (See: "Battling for Health Coverage as Cancer Spreads."] Adding insult to injury, insurers "can still require prior approval of some services and can still charge consumers more for using doctors and hospitals that are not on a list of preferred providers."
  • It is disgraceful that this coverage is job-related and it is outrageous that the immoral disparity was ever allowed. (But, it has not been that long since those with mental illness were incarcerated as the mainstay of treatment. [See Dorothea Dix's reform efforts in1844])
  • The standards, guidelines and methods used to manage mental health benefits must be comparable to those for other medical care and cannot be applied more rigorously. Discrimination is manifest by disparities such as: setting separate or higher co-payments or deductibles or applying stricter limits on the treatment of mental conditions, addiction disorders or physical illnesses.

Disparities are, unfortunately all too common in the insurance industry. "By sweeping away such restrictions, doctors said, the rules will make it easier for people to obtain treatment for a wide range of conditions, including depression, autism, schizophrenia, eating disorders and alcohol and drug abuse."

Pear R. "New Rules Promise Better Mental Health Coverage."

Related Videos
Why Are Adult ADHD Cases Climbing?
Depression Screening: Challenges and Solutions at the Primary Care Level
HCPLive Five at APA 2024 | Image Credit: HCPLive
John M. Oldham, MD: A History of Personality Disorder Pathology
Franklin King, MD: Psychedelic Therapy History, Advances, and Hurdles
Robert Weinrieb, MD: Psychiatry-Hepatology Approach for Alcohol-Related Liver Disease
Etienne Sibille, PhD: Innovations in Cognitive Pathology
Katharine Phillips, MD: Various Treatments for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders
Manish Jha, MD: Treatment Options for Treatment-Resistant Depression
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.