
Studies Conflict on Ranibizumab's Stroke Risk
In a new study, stroke occurred in 6.6% of the ranibizumab-treated group, compared with 7.0% of the controls matched by sociodemographic factors and comorbidities and 6.7% of the controls matched by sociodemographic factors only. These differences were not statistically significant.
Insufficient data has hampered efforts to come to a definitive conclusion about whether intravitreal treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents increases the risk of stroke. However, a recent study based on South Korean registry data provided additional evidence that intravitreal treatment with ranibizumab (Lucentis/Roche) is not associated with a statistically significant difference in the rate of stroke in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Soon after Genentech introduced Lucentis in 2006, it warned of an increased risk of stroke from the 0.5mg dose approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) compared with the 0.3mg dose, which was also studied. Interim analysis of SAILOR study data showed a 1.2% risk of stroke in the 0.5mg arm and a 0.3% risk in the 0.3mg arm (P = 0.02). Since then, a
Moreover,
However, other studies did not support these findings. A time series
A Canadian case-control
The South Korean study provides additional support for the conclusion that intravitreal Lucentis does not increase stroke risk in wet AMD patients. This study used national registry data on more than one million random subjects to compare a Lucentis-treated group with two matched control groups.
The treated group included 467 wet AMD patients who received intravitreal Lucentis between 2009 and 2013. The first control group included 2,330 randomly selected patients matched to the treated group by sociodemographic factors and comorbidities (hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and Charlson comorbidities index score). Another control group of 2,331 patients were matched by sociodemographic factors only. Patients were tracked until 2013, and data were analyzed by using Cox proportional hazard regression.
The South Korean team found that stroke occurred in 6.6% of the Lucentis-treated group, compared with 7.0% of the controls matched by sociodemographic factors and comorbidities and 6.7% of the controls matched by sociodemographic factors only. These differences were not statistically significant.
Moreover, multivariable Cox regression indicated that the incidence of stroke was similar for the Lucentis group and the control groups. For the Lucentis group compared with the control group matched by sociodemographic factors and comorbidities, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60—1.30). For the Lucentis group compared with the control group matched by sociodemographic factors only, the HR was 0.95 (CI, 0.64–1.41).
As a result, the South Korean team concluded that Lucentis treatment for wet AMD did not increase the risk of stroke compared with the risk for matched controls.
The study, “
Related Coverage:


























































