When it comes to ordering the correct test for Vitamin D, too many doctors just can't get it right, a new study found. A Seattle team found 66% of tests ordered for one type of test were made in error, delaying care and potentially putting patients at risk. But it took the laboratory specialists 2 years of trial and error--and a lot of patience--to get the doctors to order the right tests.
When it comes to ordering the correct test for Vitamin D, too many doctors just can't get it right, a new study found.
Physicians may need the results of vitamin D tests for a variety of patient conditions. Test results are important in diagnosing renal dysfunction, sarcoidosis, and primary hyperparathyroidism. Vitamin D levels decrease in renal failure and hypoparathyroidism.
But writing in Clinical Laboratory News, Jane Dickerson, PhD, DABCC and Michael Astion MD, PhD, of Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle WA, say there is an increase in doctors ordering the wrong tests. That can delay disease diagnosis, harm patients, and add to the expense of care.
“We found that 66% of the 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D tests were ordered in error,” when what clinicians really needed were 25-OH vitamin D tests. The 25-OH vitamin D test assesses nutritional status, checks for vitamin D intoxication and malabsorption and is also useful in assessing liver disease.
The 25-OH test has a half-life of about 3 weeks, compared to the 4-6 hour half-life of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D—making the latter test fairly useless for overall vitamin D assessment, they wrote.
The authors blame “limited physician training in specialty areas, difficult computerized physician order entry systems, numerous reference lab options, unique insurance authorization requirements, confusing test nomenclature and rapidly evolving testing strategies” for the ordering errors.
But getting the word out to physicians takes some doing, they wrote.
They started by generating automatic emails whenever someone order a vitamin D test, explaining the differences in the tests and asking physicians to be certain which one they wanted. That resulted in 53% of the 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D tests being canceled and changed to 25-OH tests.
After a year they stopped the emails but found the error rate started to climb again “suggesting that not much learning had occurred and that we needed a permanent intervention.” Checking with other institutions, they found the ordering errors were a common problem.
Next, working with their institution’s endocrinologists, they renamed the 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D test order “Vitamin D, Bone Disease or Vitamin D, Renal Disease, and the other test Vitamin D, Nurtrional Assessment.
But that had an unintended consequence: orders for 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D tests spiked. Why? Because orthopedists and nephrologists saw their specialty in the test name and added the orders to their routine order-sets.
Next, they tried using a pop-up warning generated when 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D was ordered. “We confirmed the theory that pop-up messages easily can be ignored and are not enough to change behavior,” they wrote.
Finally, they decided to hide the 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D order entirely, forcing anyone except endocrinologists or nephrologists who wanted it to search under “miscellaneous.” So far, a month into the experiment that approach seems to be working. It took 2 years to find what they hope is the solution.