FUEL: Udenafil Improves Exercise Performance, but Not Peak VO2 in Adolescents With Fontan


Udenafil positively impacted measures of exercise performance in patients after Fontan, but did not improve peak VO2.

David J. Goldberg, MD

David J. Goldberg, MD

The Fontan operation forges a cavopulmonary connection by diverting venous blood to bypass the heart and flow passively into the pulmonary arteries in patients with forms of congenital heart disease characterized by a functional single ventricle.

But this altered circulation can lead to a breakdown in cardiovascular efficiency over time, which presents as a decline in exercise performance and can lead to increased morbidity and early mortality.

In adolescents who had undergone Fontan, the novel PDE5 inhibitor udenafil has shown in phase 1/2 testing to be associated with the highest average serum concentration, with no dose-limiting adverse events.

In late-breaking results at the American Heart Association (AHA) 2019 Scientific Sessions in Philadelphia, investigators of the Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal (FUEL) trial report that treatment with 87.5 mg of udenafil twice daily was associated with statistically significant improvements in exercise performance at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) in adolescent patients who had undergone Fontan palliation.

Treatment with udenafil was generally well-tolerated and safe, but was not associated with a statistically significant improvement in oxygen consumption at peak exercise or changes in myocardial performance index, reactive hyperemia index, or log brain natriuretic peptide, presenter David J. Goldberg, MD, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, reported.

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)-funded Pediatric Heart Network initiated this industry-sponsored randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial, which randomized 400 participants to either the study drug or placebo at 30 clinical sites in North America and the Republic of Korea.

Baseline characteristics between both groups were well-balanced, with a median age of 15.4 ± 2.0 and 15.6 ± 2.0 in the udenafil and placebo groups, respectively. There was a slightly larger proportion of females in the udenafil group (44% vs 36%). Currently on anticoagulation and fluent in English, Spanish, or Korean were inclusion criteria, while participates who had small body size, significant co-morbidities, current therapy with a pulmonary vasodilator, or who had peak VO2 <50% predicted on a recent clinical exercise test were excluded.

The primary efficacy end point was the change in oxygen consumption at peak exercise over 6 months as measured by standardized cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Secondary exercise end points included changes in oxygen consumption, work rate, and ventilatory efficiency at VAT.

The change in peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) was -0.23±4.1 (200) in the udenafil group and -0.89±3.7 (200) in the placebo group (p = 0.092), while the change in VO2 at VAT (ml/min) was 33±185 (155) in the udenafil group and -9.0±193 (162) in the placebo group (p = 0.012).

There was an increased risk of headache (35% vs 25%), facial flushing (16% vs 6%), and increased erection (males only: 12% vs 2%) in the udenafil group. An ongoing open-label extension study is evaluating safety of udenafil over a longer time period.

The study, “Results From the Pediatric Heart Network’s Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal Trial,” was presented Sunday, November 17, 2019, at AHA 2019.

Related Videos
HCPLive Five at ACC 2024 | Image Credit: HCPLive
Ankeet Bhatt, MD, MBA | Credit: X.com
Ankeet Bhatt, MD, MBA | Credit: X.com
Sara Saberi, MD | Credit: University of Michigan
Muthiah Vaduganathan, MD, MPH | Credit: Brigham and Women's Hospital
Albert Foa, MD, PhD | Credit: HCPLive
Veraprapas Kittipibul, MD | Credit: X.com
Heart Failure stock imagery. | Credit: Fotolia
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.