
Investigators Explore the Impact of COVID-19 Lockdowns on Ocular Therapies
Patients with nAMD, DME, and RVO received fewer intravitreal injections between pre- and post-lockdown periods.
Data presented at the
The investigative team was led by Javier Zarranz-Ventura, MD, PhD, MSc, of Hospital Clinic Barcelona, and utilized an international database (Fight Retinal Blindness! Project) to assess patients across 8 countries: Australia, France, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, and Switzerland.
Thus, they looked at baseline visits, defined as the most recent visit within 3 months prior to lockdowns, and compared them with follow-up visits post-lockdown. A patient’s pre- and post-lockdown periods were defined up to 6 months before and after baseline visit, respectively.
For their analysis, they collected demographics, visual acuity in logMAR ETDRS letters at baseline and pre- and post-baseline visits, and number of injections.
A total of 5271 eyes from 4288 patients were assessed. Of this amount, 4240 eyes had nAMD, 605 eyes had DME, and 426 eyes had RVO. Patients used ranibizumab (33.5%), aflibercept (50.9%), and/or bevacizumab (15.5%).
Among eyes with nAMD, the mean change in visual acuity post-lockdown ranged from -0.3 to -3.3 letters. Furthermore, the median number of injections decreased from 4-5 (pre-lockdown) to 2-4; the median number of visits decreased from 4-7 to 2-4.
As for eyes with DME, mean visual acuity change ranged between -4 and +2.3 letters, with the median number of injections decreasing from 2-5 to 1-3, and the median number of visits decreasing from 4-6.5 to 2-3.
And finally, in RVO eyes, the mean change in visual acuity ranged from -2.4 to +3 letters. The median number of injections decreased from 3-7 to 1-6, and the median number of visits decreased from 4-7.5 to 2.5-6 post-lockdown.
Zarranza-Ventura and colleagues also reported dropout rates in the 6-month post-lockdown period, noting a 34% rate for nAMD, 43% for DME, and 44% for RVO.
“The data reported in this study may serve clinicians to prepare strategies to mitigate vision loss in future scenarios of the COVID-19 pandemic evolution,” wrote the investigators.
A
As such, in both cases, delaying of treatment across ocular conditions was suggested to be potentially harmful for visual outcomes.
The study, “


























































