Article

Low Serum Urate Associated with Weight Loss, Sarcopenia

Author(s):

“These observations suggest that the often-observed epidemiologic correlation between low serum urate and adverse health outcomes may be confounded."

Among patients with low serum urate (SU) concentrations, sarcopenia and weight loss are common symptoms. Body composition differences may help to explain the link between low SU and higher mortality, according to a study published in Arthritis & Rheumatology.1

Low Serum Urate Associated with Weight Loss, Sarcopenia

“A number of observational studies have linked low SU concentrations to adverse outcomes such as dementia, Parkinson’s disease and early mortality,” investigators explained. “These studies have raised the question about whether excessive urate lowering might have adverse consequences, and therefore some society gout guidelines have promulgated recommendations to be cautious with urate-lowering therapy, which may delay or negate optimal gout control. However, it is important to note that SU concentrations are strongly and positively associated with obesity and nutritional status.”

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), between 1999 and 2006, was used to evaluate adult patients (≥ 20 years) using whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) body composition scans as well as available SU concentrations. Body composition was assessed using body mass index (BMI), maximum lifetime BMI, waist circumference, and age-, sex-, and race-specific appendicular lean mass index (ALMI, kg/m2) and fat mass index (FMI, kg/m2) Z-Scores. Associations between SU and body composition were determined using logistic regression. Mortality was determined using NHANES Public Use Linked Mortality files from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). SU and mortality were assessed before and after adjusting for differences in body composition via Cox regression.

Low SU concentrations were defined as <2.5 mg/dL in women and <3.5 mg/dL in men. Of the 13,979 patients evaluated, 50% were female, the mean age was 45.9 years, and the mean BMI was 28.3. Lower SU concentrations were associated with low lean mass (ALMI and ALMIFMI Z-Scores), an underweight BMI (defined as <18.5 kg/m2), and higher rates of weight loss.

More patients in the low SU group had lower ALMI Z-Scores (29%) when compared with the normal SU group (16%, p= 0.001). Additionally, low SU was associated with increased mortality before adjustments for body composition (HR (95% CI): 1.61 [1.14,2.28], p= 0.008). However, after adjusting for body composition and weight loss, results were non-significant (HR: 1.30 [0.92,1.85], p= 0.13).

Investigators were unable to characterize metabolic health more closely among participants exhibiting low circulating urate, which limited the study. Additionally, while NHANES is generally highly representative, the limited number of patients on urate lowering therapies hindered the ability to determine specific associations between low SU levels and outcomes for those currently treated with urate-lowering therapy. Long-term outcomes, such as dementia or cognitive decline, could not be examined. Future studies could be helpful, especially within older populations. The measure of historical weight loss used in this study was self-reported and did not include whether weight loss was intentional or unintentional, which may have been helpful. However, previous research suggests that weight loss in older adults is more likely to be unintentional.

“These observations suggest that the often-observed epidemiologic correlation between low SU and adverse health outcomes may be confounded,” investigators concluded. “Investigators should take care to consider confounding related to weight loss, sarcopenia, cachexia, frailty, and related conditions when interpreting associations between low SU levels and long-term outcomes in population-based studies.”

Reference:

Baker JF, Weber DR, Neogi T, et al. Associations between low serum urate, body composition, and mortality [published online ahead of print, 2022 Aug 16]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;10.1002/art.42301. doi:10.1002/art.42301

Related Videos
John Stone, MD, MPH: Continuing Progress With IgG4-Related Disease Research
Philip Conaghan, MBBS, PhD: Investigating NT3 Inhibition for Improving Osteoarthritis
Rheumatologists Recognize the Need to Create Pediatric Enthesitis Scoring Tool
Presence of Diffuse Cutaneous Disease Linked to Worse HRQOL in Systematic Sclerosis
Alexei Grom, MD: Exploring Safer Treatment Options for Refractory Macrophage Activation Syndrome
Jack Arnold, MBBS, clinical research fellow, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine
John Tesser, MD, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine, Midwestern University, and Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, and Lecturer, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, and Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates
Gaith Noaiseh, MD: Nipocalimab Improves Disease Measures, Reduces Autoantibodies in Sjogren’s
Laure Gossec, MD, PhD: Informing Physician Treatment Choices for Psoriatic Arthritis
Søren Andreas Just, MD, PhD: Developing AI to Mitigate Rheumatologist Shortages for Disease Assessment
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.