Multiple Sclerosis: Real-World Comparison of Relapse Rates with DMTs

Article

Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) help reduce relapses in people with multiple sclerosis. While options have expanded, little is known about which one has the greatest effectiveness.

neurology, multiple sclerosis, pharmacy, disease-modifying therapies, DMTs, delayed-release dimethyl fumarate, DMF, glatiramer acetate, interferon, fingolimod, teriflunomide, Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Center, CMSC 2016

Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) help reduce relapses in people with multiple sclerosis. While options have expanded, little is known about which one has the greatest effectiveness.

In one study presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Center (CMSC) in National Harbor, Maryland, researchers analyzed five DMT treatment options. Using a database consisting of 6,372 patients with multiple sclerosis ages 18 to 64, the team assessed the number of relapses over a year. The following amount of patients were on the treatments:

  • 3,352 patients — Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF, or gastro-resistant DMF)
  • 1,057 patients — Glatiramer acetate (GA)
  • 884 patients — Interferon (IFN)
  • 579 patients — Fingolimod (FTY)
  • 500 patients — Teriflunomide

The average age in each group fell somewhere in the 40’s and most of the participants were females. Annual relapse rate (ARR) within the previous year were similar among the groups. When it came to percentage of patients who had been on another DMT treatment within the previous year, the data came in at 68.7%, 15.7%, 13.5%, 64.2%, and 66%, respectively.

  • MD Magazine is on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn!

The unadjusted ARR following DMT initiation measured in:

  • DMF: 0.30
  • GA: 0.33
  • IFN: 0.34
  • FTY: 0.31
  • TER: 0.35

The incidence rate ratio was then adjusted based on the DMF finding and the ARR came in at: 1.34 for GA, 1.27 for IFN, 1.03 for FTY, and 1.23 for TER.

“DMF demonstrated significantly better effectiveness than GA, IFN, and TER in the real-world setting,” the authors confirmed. “No significant difference was observed between DMF and FTY.”

Also on MD Magazine >>> More News from the CMSC 2016 Annual Meeting

Recent Videos
Arshad Khanani, MD: Four-Year Outcomes of Faricimab for DME in RHONE-X | Image Credit: Sierra Eye Associates
Dilraj Grewal, MD: Development of MNV in Eyes with Geographic Atrophy in GATHER | Image Credit: Duke Eye Center
Margaret Chang, MD: Two-Year Outcomes of the PDS for Diabetic Retinopathy | Image Credit: Retina Consultants Medical Group
Carl C. Awh, MD: | Image Credit:
Raj K. Maturi, MD: 4D-150 for nAMD in PRISM Population Extension Cohort | Image Credit: Retina Partners Midwest
Charles C. Wykoff, MD, PhD: Interim Analysis on Ixo-Vec Gene Therapy for nAMD | Image Credit: Retina Consultants of Texas
Sunir J. Garg, MD: Pegcetacoplan Preserves Visual Function on Microperimetry | Image Credit: Wills Eye Hospital
Edward H. Wood, MD: Pharmacodynamics of Subretinal RGX-314 for Wet AMD | Image Credit: Austin Retina Associates
Dilsher Dhoot, MD: OTX-TKI for NPDR in Interim Phase 1 HELIOS Results  | Image Credit: LinkedIn
Katherine Talcott, MD: Baseline EZ Integrity Features Predict GA Progression | Image Credit: LinkedIn
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.