Article

Short-Term Effects of Ranibizumab Biosimilar Compared to Ranibizumab for DME

A study presented at ASRS 2019 found that the ranibizumab biosimilar (razumab) was noninferior to ranibizumab after 1 month of treatment.

retina

With fixed incomes a reality for many elderly patients, finding less expensive alternatives to current therapies is a hot topic for many retina specialists.

Despite only being approved in India, the ranibizumab-biosimilar (Razumab) has caught the attention of many at the 2019 American Society of Retina Specialists Annual Meeting seeking an alternative treatment for patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). 


Sudipta Das, MD, an ophthalmologist at Sankara Nethralaya, presented a study he led at ASRS 2019 that compared the short term impact of intravitreal ranibizumab and ranibizumab on vision and central foveal thickness (CFT) in treatment-naïve patients. Results of the study revealed that both ranibizumab and ranibizumab biosimilar were safe and showed significant reductions in CFT among patients.

The retrospective, non-randomized, non-masked, consecutive case series included a total of 73 eyes from 66 patients — 32 patients were included in the ranibizumab biosimilar group and 34 were included in the ranibizumab arm.

The mean age of the ranibizumab biosimilar group 58.1 years and 23 (71%) were male. There were 20 eyes with DME and 15 eyes with macular edema in veinous occlusion group. 

The ranibizumab group had a mean age of 58.5 years and 22 (64%) were males. The group had 20 eyes with DME and 18 eyes with macular edema in veinous occlusion group.

After 1 month, investigators found that the average best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved by 48.5% of eyes and CFT improved in 85.7% in the ranibizumab biosimilar group. Mean intraocular pressure change among these patients was from 14.4 to 14.7 mm of Hg (p=0.37).



Among patients in the ranibizumab group, the average BCVA improved in 55.2% and CFT improved in 86.8% after 1 month. Investigators noted the mean IOP change was from 14.03 to 14.8 (p=.01). Additionally, investigators noted no instances of postoperative inflammation in any of the groups at 1 month.

In an interview with MD Magazine® at ASRS 2019, Das relayed that he was not surprised by the results of the study and he believes an ongoing 6-month study examining the same effects will provide similar results.

“I feel like these (results) are not surprising. We are still waiting for results of the prospective studies but we feel it will show it is not inferior to ranibizumab,” Das said.

This study, titled “Comparing Short-Term Effects and Safety of Ranibizumab Biosimilar and Ranibizumab on Vision and Central Foveal Thickness in Treatment Naïve Patients,” was presented at ASRS 2019.

Related Videos
Rahul N. Khurana, MD: Phase 1 Results on Vamikibart for Uveitic Macular Edema | Image Credit: Northern California Retina Vitreous Associates
Sunir J. Garg, MD: | Image Credit: Wills Eye Hospital
Christine N. Kay, MD: Interim Data on ATSN-201 Shows Promise for XLRS | Image Credit: Vitreo Retinal Associates
Arshad Khanani, MD: First Results from Fellow Eye Dosing of RGX-314 in nAMD | Image Credit: Sierra Eye Associates
Joel A. Pearlman, MD, PhD: Phase 2a Data on Oral RZ402 for DME | Image Credit: Retina Consultants Medical Group
Roger A. Goldberg, MD: Pooled Visual Function Data of NT-501 for MacTel | Image Credit: Bay Area Retina Associates
Durga Borkar, MD: Phase 2 Results of ONL1204 for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment | Image Credit: Duke University
Diana V. Do, MD: 3-Year PHOTON Data on Aflibercept 8 mg for DME | Image Credit: Stanford University
Eric W Schneider, MD: Comparing AI-Based Home OCT to In-Office OCT Scans | Image Credit: Tennessee Retina
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.