How Do Patients Perceive Oral Oncology Drugs?

Article

In a poster presented at the ECCO 15 – ESMO 34 Joint Congress, Dr B. Homet and colleagues from the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital “12 de Octubre,” Madrid, Spain, outlined the results of a study sought to assess patient opinions on both oral and intravenous (IV) cancer treatments.

Although standard chemotherapeutic agents are frequently administered intravenously, oral agents are becoming more prominent. In a poster presented at the ECCO 15 — ESMO 34 Joint Congress, Dr B. Homet and colleagues from the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital “12 de Octubre,” Madrid, Spain, outlined the results of a study that sought to assess patient opinions on both oral and intravenous (IV) cancer treatments.

A total of 190 patients were enrolled in the study and completed a survey in which they were asked to compare differences in preference, tolerance, and effectiveness between oral and IV chemotherapy. Of these patients, 70% (n = 133) were women with a median age of 60 years at diagnosis (range, 28 to 91 years). The majority (50%) had gynecological tumors, with 90% of these being breast cancer, 30% had gastrointestinal cancer, 18% had lung cancer, and 2% had other neoplasms.

The survey revealed that the majority of patients preferred oral therapy over IV administration (76% vs. 20%; P <.001), but that 60% considered IV chemotherapy to be more effective, while 11% chose oral therapy and 29% found both equally effective (P <.001). Patients generally tolerated oral therapy better than IV chemotherapy (64% vs. 36%; P <.001). The most common adverse event with oral therapy was diarrhea compared with vomiting for IV treatments.

Dr Homet and colleagues concluded that the study demonstrates a patient preference for oral therapy, which is generally tolerated better, but that patients do not perceive oral treatments as being as effective. Clinicians prescribing oral therapies may consider discussing the efficacy of these drugs with their patients.

ECCO/ESMO Poster 1246

To locate this poster, visit www.poster-submission.com/visitor/pstlist.

Recent Videos
Arshad Khanani, MD: Four-Year Outcomes of Faricimab for DME in RHONE-X | Image Credit: Sierra Eye Associates
Dilraj Grewal, MD: Development of MNV in Eyes with Geographic Atrophy in GATHER | Image Credit: Duke Eye Center
Margaret Chang, MD: Two-Year Outcomes of the PDS for Diabetic Retinopathy | Image Credit: Retina Consultants Medical Group
Carl C. Awh, MD: | Image Credit:
Raj K. Maturi, MD: 4D-150 for nAMD in PRISM Population Extension Cohort | Image Credit: Retina Partners Midwest
Charles C. Wykoff, MD, PhD: Interim Analysis on Ixo-Vec Gene Therapy for nAMD | Image Credit: Retina Consultants of Texas
Sunir J. Garg, MD: Pegcetacoplan Preserves Visual Function on Microperimetry | Image Credit: Wills Eye Hospital
Edward H. Wood, MD: Pharmacodynamics of Subretinal RGX-314 for Wet AMD | Image Credit: Austin Retina Associates
Dilsher Dhoot, MD: OTX-TKI for NPDR in Interim Phase 1 HELIOS Results  | Image Credit: LinkedIn
Katherine Talcott, MD: Baseline EZ Integrity Features Predict GA Progression | Image Credit: LinkedIn
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.