Should You Invest Like Suze Orman?

Article

Financial advisor, writer, and TV personality Suze Orman has $25 million in liquid net worth, according to a recent New York Times report. Of this, she related that $1 million is in the stock market. The rest is apparently in zero-coupon municipal bonds, triple-A-rated and insured.

Financial advisor, writer, and TV personality Suze Orman has $25 million in liquid net worth, according to a recent New York Times report. Of this, she related that $1 million is invested in the stock market. The rest is apparently in zero-coupon municipal bonds, triple-A-rated and insured.

That's a very safe position. But will it yield the best return? Orman plans to receive a return of approximately 4% per year with a tax advantage bringing it up to 6% to 7% per year at best. If Orman does bring home 7% post-tax on $1 million over the next 20 years, and those with more diversified portfolios bring in a modest 8% post tax per year, what would that 1% difference mean, assuming management fees and turn over are the same? (See Chart A.)

Based on her approach, Orman will have nearly $3.9 million. The more diversified investor would have almost $4.7 million, a difference of $800,000 in the favor of diversification. Of course, this assumes that the past is some indication of the future.

If an $800,000 return to the diversified investor does not sound impressive enough, what would happen if Orman reinvested 80% of her entire liquid portfolio of $25 million? If Orman took $20 million and invested it in stocks rather than municipal bonds, she still would have $5 million in bonds for a rainy day. (See Chart B.)

At the end of 20 years at a 7% return, Orman would have more than $77 million. The diversified investor, on the other hand, would have $20 million growing at 8% over 20 years resulting in a return of $93 million. The difference in the diversified investor's favor is almost $16 million. Asset allocation is responsible for more than 90% of a portfolio's return, according to Modern Portfolio Theory proposed by Professors Markowitz, Miller, and Sharpe, winners of a 1990 Nobel Prize.

Asset allocation is the process of dividing a portfolio among major asset categories such as bonds, stocks, and cash. Its purpose is to reduce risk for a specified return by diversifying the portfolio. Although Orman may choose to invest against the principles of scientific financial wisdom, most physician-investors may want to pay attention to the men who won the Noble Prize. Otherwise, you could limit opportunities for putting money in your own pocket.

Dr. Mueller is a physician turned financial consultant and investment educator. She teaches others how to invest their own money using a Noble Prize-wining financial strategy. Her fee is hourly, not a percentage of assets. She welcomes comments at ShirleyMMueller@MyMoneyMD.com. For more information, visit her web site at MyMoneyMd.com.

Recent Videos
1 KOL is featured in this Insights series.
Charles C. Wykoff, MD, PhD: Interim Analysis on Ixo-Vec Gene Therapy for nAMD | Image Credit: Retina Consultants of Texas
Sunir J. Garg, MD: Pegcetacoplan Preserves Visual Function on Microperimetry | Image Credit: Wills Eye Hospital
Edward H. Wood, MD: Pharmacodynamics of Subretinal RGX-314 for Wet AMD | Image Credit: Austin Retina Associates
A panel of 5 experts on iron deficiency anemia
Sorana Segal-Maurer, MD, an expert on HIV
Shawn Kwatra, MD, an expert on atopic dermatitis
Shawn Kwatra, MD, an expert on atopic dermatitis
Shawn Kwatra, MD, an expert on atopic dermatitis
Ruth Ann Vleugels, MD, MPH, MBA, an expert on atopic dermatitis
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.