Article

Sacubutril-Valsartan Better than Enalapril for Acute Heart Failure

Adding a neprilysin inhibitor to an angiotensin receptor blocker may benefit patients hospitalized for acute heart failure more than an angiotensin receptor blocker alone, a study shows.

(©LiyaGraphicsShutterstock.com)

(©LiyaGraphicsShutterstock.com)

Adding a neprilysin inhibitor to an angiotensin receptor blocker may benefit patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) more than an angiotensin receptor blocker alone, according to the PIONEER-HF trial published online on Feb. 7 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Each year, over one million people in the U.S. are hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure, of which about 12 percent die. Yet the standard of care for treating decompensated heart failure has remained about the same for the past 45 years.

Sacubitril is a newer drug that inhibits neprilysin, an enzyme involved in blood pressure control.  Sacubutril combined with valsartan has been found to be effective in decreasing the risk of cardiovascular death in outpatients with heart failure.  But studies have not included patients hospitalized for heart failure.

To test the safety and efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan in this group, researchers conducted a randomized, double-blind controlled trial. The study took place at 129 hospitals in the U.S. Researchers randomized 440 patients hospitalized for heart failure to sacubitril-valsartan and 441 to enalapril for eight weeks. Most (72.1 percent) were male, and 35.9 percent were black. 

Both groups showed a decrease over time in NT-proBNP concentration, a biomarker that may predict cardiovascular events. But the sacubutril-valsartan group showed a significantly greater decrease compared to the enalapril group, and this decrease appeared as early as the first week.

The benefits for sacubutril-valsartan (Entresto, Novartis) appeared similar regardless of age, race (white vs black), kidney function and severity of heart failure.

Both groups had similar rates of adverse events. About 20 percent in each group discontinued treatment, mainly because of adverse events. 

“The results of the PIONEER-HF trial extend the evidence base regarding the use of sacubitril–valsartan to populations for which there had been limited or no data,” wrote first author Eric Velazquez, M.D., of Yale University School of Medicine and colleagues.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Veronica Hackethal, M.D., MSc, is a medical journalist based in New York City who is a long-time contributor to the Modern Medicine Network publications. Her writing has also appeared in the New York Times, Chicago Tribune, NBCNews.com, Reuters Health, Nature Medicine News and Medscape. She is a graduate of Harvard University, Oxford University and Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons (M.D.).

REFERENCE
Velazquez EJ, Morrow DA, DeVore AD, et al. “Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure,” NEJM. Feb. 7, 2019. ePpub, Nov. 11, 2018. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812851.

 

Related Videos
Jörn Schattenberg, MD | Credit: Novo Nordisk
The APAC Recap: Cardiomyopathy at CAPP Live 2024 with Greg Duck, PA-C | Image Credit: APAC
Insights from Long-Term ASSURE Data for Seladelpar
What Sets Seladelpar Apart From Other PBC Therapies
The Clinical Impact of Seladelpar in PBC Care
Understanding Seladelpar as a Second-Line Treatment for PBC
Orrin Troum, MD: Accurately Imaging Gout With DECT Scanning
4 experts are featured in this series.
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.