Video

The Risks of Switching Psoriasis Biologics During COVID-19

What are the risks for switching biologics during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Brad Glick, DO, FAAD: I think one has to ask the questions first, 'Is it a primary failure, a drug that has just been unsuccessful? Has the drug been working, and now it's not—so kind of what we call secondary failure or loss of response down the road, if you will? Or is the patient having an adverse reaction?' What are the downsides of switching during the pandemic? I think it's really dictated by one factor, and that is if the patient is well, biologic therapies should not be disrupted during the pandemic. And I think that we have some pretty nice guidelines and guidance from the National Psoriasis Foundation, also in conjunction with the COVID-19 Task Force of the American Academy of Dermatology. So, it's very situational.

But if someone is not doing well, and their skin is flaring, and we need to change their biologic—whether there's a secondary failure or a primary failure, just not responding in a short period of time—then it's perfectly fine to change the biologic. Obviously, what we don't want to have happen is for someone to develop an infection while on a biologic therapy, but we counsel patients before putting them on any immunosuppressive therapy, including biologics before placing them on such an agent. And throughout the pandemic, we've told our patients clearly, even those who we felt were severe enough to place them on a systemic therapy like a biologic, just like we do with any other infection, that should they develop any symptoms of an infection, including those symptoms that would worry us about COVID-19—not just the respiratory symptoms and the fever, but for instance, one of the hallmarks of COVID-19 we've learned in this last year, which is a loss of taste—stop the biological right away. Of course, notify us immediately of such symptoms, contact your general physician as well.

But in my opinion, I don't see a lot of downside in switching if there is a specific necessity to switch, and I don't know that the pandemic specifically impairs that specifically where biologics are concerned, because they are highly targeted therapies, particularly the newer generation therapies like the interleukin 17 blockers and the interleukin 23 blockers.


Related Videos
Jennifer B. Green, MD: Implementation of Evidence-Based Therapies for T2D | Image Credit: Duke University
Ralph A. DeFronzo, MD: Noxious Nine and Mifepristone for Hypercortisolism in T2D | Image Credit: LinkedIn
Matthew Weir, MD: Prioritizing Cardiovascular Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease | Image Credit: University of Maryland
Tadashi Matsushita, MD, PhD: Reducing Treatment Burden in Hemophilia A With Mim8
Erin Michos, MD: HFpEF in Women and Sex-Specific Therapeutic Approaches | Image Credit: Johns Hopkins
Davide Matino, MD, MSc: Bringing Marstacimab Treatment to Hemophilia A and B
Ben Samelson-Jones,Ben Samelson-Jones, MD, PhD: Validating Long-Term Safety of Hemophilia AAV Gene Therapy MD, PhD: Validating Long-Term Safety of Hemophilia AAV Gene Therapy
Françoise Bernaudin, MD: A Decade of Follow-up Reveals allo-SCT Superiority Over SOC for Sickle Cell Anemia
Achieving Quick Responses in Sickle Cell Anemia With Early, Appropriate Hydroxyurea Dosing, with Abena Appiah-Kubi, MD, MPH
Highlighting the Danger of SCI Progression during iTTP Remission, with Shruti Chaturvedi, MBSS, MS
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.