Of 419 patients treated with depemokimab in both years, 405 entered the clinical remission analysis set.¹ A total of 30% (123/405) achieved clinical remission at the end of year 1, and 59% (73/123) of these patients maintained remission at the end of year 2.¹ The remaining 70% did not reach remission in year 1.¹
During year 2, the annualized exacerbation rate was 0.19 (95% CI, 0.12–0.29) among patients in remission at year 1, compared with 0.69 (95% CI, 0.57–0.82) among patients not in remission.¹ Wechsler noted patients who sustained remission into year 2 had no exacerbations, stable or improved lung function, no significant symptoms, and no steroid use for asthma.
Depemokimab Year 2 Outcomes in FEV1, ACQ-5, and SGRQ Scores
Frequently Asked Questions
What is depemokimab approved for?
Depemokimab (Exdensur) is FDA approved as add-on maintenance treatment for severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype in patients aged 12 years and older, dosed by subcutaneous injection twice yearly.²
How does depemokimab work?
Depemokimab is an ultra-long-acting monoclonal antibody with enhanced IL-5 binding affinity and an extended half-life, which reduces eosinophilic inflammation and allows dosing every 6 months.¹
What did the SWIFT/AGILE remission analysis show?
Of patients in clinical remission at the end of year 1, 59% remained in remission at year 2, with a year 2 annualized exacerbation rate of 0.19 vs 0.69 in patients not in remission.¹
Patients achieving remission at the end of year 1 showed greater improvements across all 3 secondary outcomes at the end of year 2, measured as least squares mean change from SWIFT-1/-2 baseline.¹ St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score improved by −23.57 points (95% CI, −26.53 to −20.62) in the remission group vs −13.15 points (95% CI, −15.13 to −11.17) in the nonremission group.¹
ACQ-5 score changed by −1.34 (95% CI, −1.51 to −1.17) in patients with year 1 remission vs −0.71 (95% CI, −0.82 to −0.60) in patients without remission.¹ Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 improved by 379 mL (95% CI, 301–458) vs 85 mL (95% CI, 33–137), respectively.¹ The trend remained consistent at every assessed timepoint during year 2.¹
Wechsler emphasized the 70% of patients not meeting the 4-component definition in year 1 may still benefit from continued treatment. He described remission as a high bar and noted ongoing debate among experts on which components and what duration should define it.
“Not everyone’s going to achieve remission, but they might still have benefits,” Wechsler said. “They might have benefits in terms of reduction in steroid dose, reduction in exacerbations, improvement in lung function, [and] improvement in symptoms.”
He added a 3-component definition without a lung function criterion may better fit patients with a near-normal baseline FEV1, for whom eliminating prior exacerbations is the more meaningful outcome.
“Sometimes some people start off [with] a high lung function,” he said. “If their FEV1 is 85%, they may not necessarily improve in terms of lung function. Whereas if they had two exacerbations in the year prior, that is important.”
Editor’s note: Reported disclosures for Wechsler include GENZYME CORPORATION, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, and more.
References
Wechsler ME, Tacon CE, Muccino D, et al. Attainment of clinical remission with twice-yearly depemokimab in year 1 is associated with improved clinical outcomes in year 2: SWIFT/AGILE integrated analysis. Presented at: CHEST 2026; October 20, 2026; Phoenix, AZ.