The coprimary endpoints were the between-group differences in percent change from baseline in plasma angiotensinogen and change in office systolic blood pressure at week 20.
AGT Suppression Diverged, Blood Pressure Did Not
At week 20, participants receiving monthly tonlamarsen demonstrated a least-squares (LS) mean reduction in plasma angiotensinogen of 67.2% (95% CI, -71.9 to -62.4) compared with 23.0% (95% CI, -27.8 to -18.2) among those receiving a single dose followed by placebo, a statistically significant between-group difference of -44.1% (97.5% CI, -51.9 to -36.4; P <.0001).
However, the change in office systolic blood pressure was identical between arms at week 20. Specifically, a reduction of -6.7 mmHg was observed in both groups, yielding a between-group difference of -0.1 mmHg (95% CI, -4.5 to 4.4; P = .97). No significant between-group differences were observed in home systolic blood pressure, office diastolic blood pressure, or proportion of participants achieving a systolic blood pressure below 130 mmHg.
The investigators noted the 23% residual suppression of angiotensinogen observed at week 20 in participants who received only 1 dose was unexpected given tonlamarsen's elimination half-life of 2 to 4 weeks. The persistence of angiotensinogen suppression in the placebo arm may have introduced a carryover effect confounded the blood pressure comparison between arms.
“One possibility, which we think is most likely, is that tonlamarsen lowers blood pressure by about 6-7 mmHg, and this is maintained even as angiotensinogen levels rise,” Laffin added. “Another possibility is that residual angiotensin suppression among placebo participants resulted in greater blood pressure reduction than expected. It’s also possible that decreasing angiotensin with tonlamarsen doesn’t reduce blood pressure, although we think that’s probably not likely based on the fact that blood pressure dropped during the drug run-in period.”
KARDINAL Safety Outcomes and Trial Limitations
Serious adverse events were infrequent and occurred in 2.1% of single-dose participants and 5.0% of those receiving ongoing tonlamarsen. A single death occurred in the monthly dosing arm and was assessed as unrelated to study drug by the site investigator. Injection site reactions were more common with multiple doses (19% vs 3%).
Trial investigators called attention to multiple limitations, including its active run-in design, which precluded a clean placebo comparator for assessing the true magnitude of blood pressure reduction. Additional limitations highlighted by investigators included its restriction to US sites, which may limit generalizability, and its modest sample size and short duration, which were insufficient to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes. Investigators suggested future trials should include a true placebo group without a tonlamarsen run-in.
References:
Laffin LJ, Wang Q, Sarraju A, et al. Efficacy of Tonlamarsen in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension: The KARDINAL Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Published online March 28, 2026. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.03.034