
- May 15 2003
- Volume 10
- Issue 9
DOING THE MATH
If your stock mutual fund isreturning 20% a year, why shouldyou care if it has a 1.5% expenseratio? Because when stocks are staggeringto year-end losses or postingmodest gains, a heavy expense ratiocan put a big hole in your profits oradd to your losses. Over time, highexpense ratios can take a huge toll. Anest egg in a fund that returns anaverage 10% a year and charges1.5% for expenses will eat up abouta third of your profits over 30 years.In contrast, a fund with a 0.2%expense ratio will use up just 5.3% ofyour 30-year profits paying offexpenses. According to a study byJohn Bogle, founder of VanguardGroup, low-cost stock funds beattheir high-cost cousins by an averageof 2.2% a year over a 10-year period.
Articles in this issue
over 17 years ago
Postwar Economy Refocuses Attentionover 17 years ago
Model Portfolio Series: Conservative Growthover 17 years ago
How Does Your Financial IQ Measure Up?over 17 years ago
History Provides Lessons in Investingover 17 years ago
Read the Market's Long-Term Performanceover 17 years ago
Less Is More When Buying Stock Spinoffsover 17 years ago
Weigh the Aspects of Variable Annuitiesover 17 years ago
Maximize Your Sale of Stocks at a Lossover 17 years ago
Realize the Importance of Market Timingover 17 years ago
Speed Through Annual Reports Like a Pro





















































