Topline results from a phase 2 trial of tebapivat in patients aged ≥16 years with sickle cell disease (SCD) showed improvements in hemoglobin and markers of hemolysis but did not demonstrate sufficient differentiation to support continued development of the pyruvate kinase (PK) activator, prompting Agios to discontinue the program.
"These phase 2 data further reinforce PK activation as a clinically validated mechanism in sickle cell disease, with tebapivat demonstrating hematologic activity consistent with this class of medicine," said Sarah Gheuens, MD, PhD, chief medical officer and head of research and development at Agios, in a statement. "However, the results did not establish the level of differentiation we believe is necessary to support continued development."
Tebapivat Phase 2 at a Glance
- Population: 59 patients aged ≥16 years with SCD
- Design: 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial
- Primary endpoint: ≥1.0 g/dL increase in hemoglobin during Weeks 10-12
- Top hemoglobin response: 47.1% with 5.0 mg tebapivat
- Outcome: Agios discontinued development in SCD
Phase 2 Trial Evaluated Dose Response
The phase 2 trial was designed to characterize the dose-response relationship of tebapivat in SCD and evaluate whether the therapy demonstrated a differentiated profile relative to other PK activators.
The 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized 59 patients in a 2:2:2:1 ratio to receive once-daily tebapivat at doses of 2.5 mg, 5.0 mg, or 7.5 mg or placebo QD.
The primary endpoint was hemoglobin response, defined as a ≥1.0 g/dL increase in average hemoglobin concentration during Weeks 10 through 12 compared with baseline.
According to Agios, the primary endpoint was achieved by 43.8% (n = 7/16), 47.1% (n = 8/17), and 29.4% (n = 5/17) of patients receiving 2.5 mg, 5.0 mg, and 7.5 mg tebapivat, respectively, compared with 33.3% (n = 3/9) receiving placebo.
The company also reported improvements in hemoglobin levels and markers of hemolysis across tebapivat dose groups, findings it said were consistent with the established mechanism of PK activation. Safety and tolerability were consistent with prior SCD studies.
Why Did Agios End Development?
Although tebapivat demonstrated hematologic activity, Agios stated that the phase 2 findings did not establish the level of differentiation it considered necessary to support continued development in SCD. The company did not cite safety or tolerability concerns as a reason for discontinuing the program.