The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants achieving at least a 75% reduction from baseline in EASI score at the 16-week mark. EASI scores range from 0, suggesting the presence of clear skin, to 72, reflecting severe disease. Pruritus, or itch, was measured via the patient-reported Itch Numeric Rating Scale (I-NRS), scored from 0 - 10.¹
The mid-dose regimen matched the induction regimen previously studied in APEX Part A.¹
How Effective Was Zumilokibart for Skin Clearance and Itch?
Each zumilokibart regimen produced a statistically significant EASI-75 response compared with placebo at Week 16. AbbVie has not yet released response rates for individual arms.¹
The mid- and high-dose regimens also outperformed placebo across key secondary end points, including near-complete or complete skin clearance measured by EASI-90 and EASI-100 and itch improvement of at least 4 points on the I-NRS (I-NRS4).¹
Early separation from placebo was observed with the mid-dose regimen, which achieved greater percent reductions in EASI by week 1 and in I-NRS by Week 2.¹
Melinda Gooderham, MD, FRCPC, of the SKiN Centre for Dermatology and Queen's University in Ontario, Canada, pointed to dosing frequency as a meaningful consideration when choosing long-term therapy for a chronic condition such as atopic dermatitis. She said the Week 16 skin and itch improvements justify further study of zumilokibart as a long-term treatment.¹
What Adverse Events Were Reported with Zumilokibart?
Through the 16-week mark, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events, occurring in at least 5% of subjects in any group, included nasopharyngitis, headache, noninfective conjunctivitis, upper respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, and atopic dermatitis. The release did not break down event rates by treatment arm.¹
Kori Wallace, MD, vice president and global head of immunology clinical development at AbbVie, noted a continued need for atopic dermatitis drugs combining meaningful disease control with greater convenience. She characterized the move to phase 3, along with assessments of extended dosing intervals, as a key move toward a differentiated treatment option.¹
Zumilokibart is not approved by any regulatory authority, and its safety and efficacy have not been established.¹ AbbVie noted the phase 3 program will further assess the efficacy, safety, and dosing profile of the mid-dose regimen, including extended dosing intervals.
Editor's Note: This summary has been edited for grammar and clarity using artificial intelligence tools.
References
A long-term safety and efficacy study evaluating APG777 in atopic dermatitis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07003425. Updated 2026. Accessed September 30, 2026. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07003425.