Frequently Asked Questions:
- Does disease duration affect bimekizumab response in HS?
In post hoc BE HEARD EXT data, 47.4% of patients diagnosed less than 2.38 years before treatment achieved IHS4-100 at 3 years, versus 33.3% of those diagnosed 10.74 years or more earlier.
- Can bimekizumab reduce tunnels in hidradenitis suppurativa?
At 1 year, 30.7% of patients receiving bimekizumab had no draining or nondraining tunnels, up from 14.5% at baseline, per a pooled post hoc analysis of BE HEARD I and II.
Earlier bimekizumab (Bimzelx) treatment has been linked with higher rates of complete inflammatory lesion resolution through 3 years in moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), post hoc analyses of the phase 3 BE HEARD I and II trials and the BE HEARD EXT open-label extension suggest.¹˒²
These data were presented by UCB at the 2026 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Congress. The analyses were among 9 HS-focused abstracts UCB brought to the congress in Vienna, Austria. Additional findings addressed draining tunnels by prior biologic exposure, total tunnel counts, quality of life, and long-term safety.¹
Bimekizumab selectively inhibits both interleukin 17F (IL-17F) and IL-17A. According to UCB, IL-17F is more abundant than IL-17A in HS serum and lesional skin, with the highest expression found in draining tunnels.¹
Does Earlier Bimekizumab Treatment Improve Outcomes in Hidradenitis Suppurativa?
Investigators compared International HS Severity Score System (IHS4) responses between patients in the shortest disease duration quartile (less than 2.38 years since diagnosis; n = 97) and the longest (10.74 years or more; n = 81). At 3 years, complete resolution of inflammatory lesions, or IHS4-100, occurred in 47.4% of the shortest-duration group versus 33.3% of the longest-duration group.¹˒²
IHS4-90 responses followed a similar pattern, at 62.9% versus 53.1%, as did IHS4-75 responses, at 79.4% versus 70.4%. IHS4-55 rates were comparable, at 89.7% and 91.4%, respectively.¹
Prior biologic use also appeared to influence draining tunnel outcomes. At 3 years, 67.3% of biologic-naive patients achieved complete draining tunnel resolution compared with 47.7% of biologic-experienced patients.¹˒³
Mean draining tunnel count fell from 3.3 to 0.8 among biologic-naive patients and from 5.6 to 1.3 among biologic-experienced patients over the same period.¹
Did Bimekizumab Reduce Total Tunnels in Hidradenitis Suppurativa?
A pooled 1-year analysis from BE HEARD I and II examined total tunnels, encompassing both draining and nondraining tracts. At the point of baseline, 14.5% of 868 patients had no tunnels of any kind; among 613 patients completing the first year, this proportion rose to 30.7%.¹˒⁴