Key Facts
- Drug: lunsotogene parvec-cwha
- Indication: OTOF-related hearing loss
- Action: FDA accelerated approval
- Population: ages 10 months to 16 years
- Primary outcome: PTA ≤70 dB HL at 24 wk
- Key efficacy: 80% met primary end point
- Secondary outcome: ABR ≤90 dB at 24 wk
- Key safety: otitis media, dizziness
- Europe: orphan designation only
OTOF encodes otoferlin, a protein required for synaptic transmission between inner hair cells and the auditory nerve. Pathogenic variants typically cause auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder or congenital severe hearing loss despite structurally intact cochlear hair cells, making the disorder an attractive target for gene replacement strategies.2,3 The approved product is an adeno-associated virus vector–based therapy delivered by intracochlear infusion under general anesthesia, using a surgical approach similar to cochlear implantation.1
In CHORD, 20 participants aged 10 months to 16 years received a single dose either unilaterally (n = 10) or bilaterally (n = 10).1 All had profound hearing loss by behavioral pure tone audiometry (PTA) at baseline and lacked auditory brainstem response (ABR) at maximum sound levels, according to the release. The primary end point was improvement in hearing sensitivity by average PTA at week 24.
Among the 20 treated participants, 16 (80%) reached a hearing threshold of 70 dB hearing level or better at 24 weeks, meeting the primary end point; 1 additional participant met that threshold by week 48. On the key secondary end point, 14 participants (70%) demonstrated ABR at 90 dB or less by week 24. In longer-term follow-up, all prior responders reportedly maintained response, and 5 of 12 participants (42%) with 48-week follow-up achieved hearing thresholds of 25 dB or less, which the company described as normal hearing including whispers.1 Because approval is accelerated, continued approval may depend on confirmatory evidence from the ongoing CHORD trial.
Safety findings should be interpreted in the context of both the gene therapy and the required otologic procedure. In the CHORD safety population (n = 24), the most common adverse reactions, each reported in at least 5%, were otitis media, vomiting, nausea, dizziness, procedural pain, gait disturbance, and nystagmus.1 The prescribing information summarized in the release also notes risks associated with inner ear surgery, including vertigo, tinnitus, cerebrospinal fluid leak, facial weakness, meningitis, mastoiditis, wound infection, and labyrinthitis. The therapy is not recommended when preoperative imaging suggests that access to the inner ear is not feasible, including abnormal mastoid pneumatization or clinically significant anatomic variation.
The clinical relevance of the approval lies partly in the limitations of current management. Hearing aids may amplify sound but do not correct synaptic transmission defects, and cochlear implantation—while often beneficial in OTOF-related deafness—requires an implanted device and long-term hardware dependence.2,3 Whether gene replacement will alter long-term language acquisition, developmental outcomes, bilateral hearing function, or the timing and need for cochlear implantation remains to be established in larger cohorts with longer follow-up.
The company said it will provide the therapy at no cost in the US, although administration-related costs may still apply.1 That access model is unusual, but it does not change the narrow regulatory scope of the approval or the practical requirement for specialized surgical centers. Regulatory submissions are planned outside the US; the European Medicines Agency has granted orphan designation, but no approval was reported in Europe.
The main limitations of the current evidence are the small sample size, open-label design, mixed unilateral and bilateral treatment cohorts, and reliance on surrogate and intermediate auditory end points at an early time point. Even so, the approval establishes a regulatory pathway for inner ear gene therapy and will likely intensify interest in genotype-specific treatment strategies for hereditary hearing loss.
References
Shearer AE, Smith RJH. Massively parallel sequencing for genetic diagnosis of hearing loss: the new standard of care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153(2):175-182.
Delmaghani S, El-Amraoui A. Inner ear gene therapies take off: advances for monogenic forms of deafness. Hum Mol Genet. 2020;29(R1):R80-R88.