Sphingolipid profiles differed significantly between patients with fibrotic ILD and healthy controls in both sample types.1 Compared with controls, plasma hexosylceramide C24:0 and ceramide C24:1 were significantly altered in ILD, as were EBC sphingomyelin C24:0 and ceramide C24:1.1
Subtype-specific signatures also emerged. In plasma, dihydrosphingosine (DHSo) and ceramide C24:0 differed significantly between fHP and IPF, and in EBC, sphingomyelin C24:1, ceramide C24:0, and sphingomyelin C18:0 distinguished the 2 diseases.1 The abstract did not report the direction or magnitude of these differences or any measure of diagnostic accuracy.
Sphingolipid associations with GAP score, DLCO, and FVC
In IPF, plasma hexosylceramide C18:0 (R2 = 0.15; P = .025) and hexosylceramide C14:0 (R2 = 0.18; P = .016) correlated with gender-age-physiology (GAP) score.1 EBC hexosylceramide C18:1 correlated with GAP score (R2 = 0.28; P = .014), diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO; R2 = 0.40; P = .002), and forced vital capacity (FVC; R2 = 0.25; P = .02).1
Key Facts
Can sphingolipids distinguish IPF from fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis?
In this single-center study, several plasma and exhaled breath condensate sphingolipid species differed significantly between IPF and fHP, but diagnostic accuracy was not reported and the findings require validation.
What is exhaled breath condensate?
Exhaled breath condensate is a noninvasive sample of cooled, collected exhaled breath containing airway-derived molecules, including lipids, which can be analyzed by mass spectrometry.
Were sphingolipids linked to disease severity?
Yes. In IPF, EBC hexosylceramide C18:1 correlated with GAP score, DLCO, and FVC, and in fHP, plasma sphingosine-1-phosphate correlated with GAP-ILD score.
In fHP, plasma sphingosine-1-phosphate correlated with GAP-ILD score (R2 = 0.20; P = .001).1 EBC hexosylceramide C16:0 correlated with both GAP-ILD (R2 = 0.31; P = .014) and FVC (R2 = 0.31; P = .014), and hexosylceramide C18:0 correlated with FVC (R2 = 0.25; P = .036).1
Associations were assessed with multivariable regression, and the abstract did not describe adjustment for multiple comparisons across the sphingolipid species tested.1 The EBC analyses included 11 to 20 participants per group, and the findings have not been validated in an external cohort.
"Differentiating IPF from fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis remains a major clinical challenge," Mullholand said.2
The investigators concluded the results support further study of sphingolipid profiling as a noninvasive biomarker approach for characterizing fibrotic ILD.1
References
Mullholand J, Camus S, Reyna J, et al. Noninvasive sphingolipid profiling distinguishes IPF from fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. CHEST. 2026;170(4S). doi:10.1016/j.chest.2026.07.2677
American College of Chest Physicians. Noninvasive sphingolipid profiling may help differentiate fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. News release. October 12, 2026. Accessed October 18, 2026.