
Tirzepatide Bests Dulaglutide in Cardiovascular Outcomes in HF, With Stephen Nicholls, MD
Nicholls highlights tirzepatide’s capacity to lower the risk of heart failure mortality, as well as hospitalizations or urgent visits.
Patients with
These data were presented at the
“SURPASS-CVOT wasn’t specifically a heart failure study, but 20% of people in the trial had a prior history of heart failure,” Nicholls told HCPLive in an exclusive interview. “So, it becomes really important because we know there’s emerging data suggesting that the GLP-1 receptor agonists and tirzepatide have favorable effects on quality of life, 6-minute walk, and potential clinical events in patients with obesity-associated heart failure.”
SURPASS-CVOT was an event-driven, randomized, double-blind, active comparator, parallel-group study conducted at 640 sites across 30 countries. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either subcutaneous tirzepatide in doses up to 15 mg or dulaglutide 1.5 mg, once weekly. Patients were then followed for cardiovascular outcomes and other measures every 4 weeks for the first 24 weeks, and then every 3 months thereafter.2
Patients eligible for inclusion were required to be ≥40 years of age, have
A total of 13,299 patients were randomized during the trial, with a mean age of 64.1 +/- 8.8 years and a mean BMI of 32.6 +/- 5.5 kg/m2. Ultimately, tirzepatide demonstrated non-inferiority to dulaglutide, reducing major adverse cardiovascular events such as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or
In this prespecified analysis, Nicholls and colleagues highlighted the cardiovascular effects displayed in the trial, specifically in patients with and without a history of HF at baseline. Cardiovascular events included time to first occurrence of HF composite – consisting of HF events requiring hospitalization and all-cause or cardiovascular death – and individual outcomes of HF, as well as major adverse cardiovascular events.1
Ultimately, the composite of all-cause death or HF events occurred in a substantially lower proportion of patients in the tirzepatide group (10.5% vs 12.1%; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.95). Among a total of 2678 (20.3%) patients with a history of HF, more patients had a history of coronary artery disease (77.6% vs 61.8%) and prior myocardial infarction (57.8% vs 44.5%) than those without HF.1
In patients with a history of HF, Nicholls and colleagues found HRs of 0.83 for all-cause death or HF events (95% CI, 0.7-0.99), 0.85 for cardiovascular death or HF events (95% CI, 0.7-1.03), 0.8 for cardiovascular death (95% CI, 0.63-1.02), and 0.97 for hospitalization or urgent visits for HF (95% CI, 0.73-1.27).1
“I think the take-home message is that this is a useful therapeutic in the clinic,” Nicholls said. “It has favorable effects on a range of metabolic parameters which are superior to GLP-1 receptor agonists. It looks like it’s at least as good in terms of atherosclerotic events; if you look at heart failure events combined, there’s a more favorable effect. I think the next step is to see what that looks like in prospective trials in patients with heart failure.”
References
Nicholls S, D’Alessio D. Once-weekly Tirzepatide versus Dulaglutide for Heart Failure Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes, ASCVD, and History of Heart Failure (pre-specified analysis of the SURPASS-CVOT Randomized Clinical Trial). Presented at the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2025. New Orleans, Louisiana. November 8-10.
Nicholls SJ, Bhatt DL, Buse JB, et al. Comparison of tirzepatide and dulaglutide on major adverse cardiovascular events in participants with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: SURPASS-CVOT design and baseline characteristics. Am Heart J. 2024;267:1-11.
doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2023.09.007











































































