All participants then received telikibart 300 mg every 2 weeks through Week 52, with placebo recipients given a 600 mg loading dose at crossover.¹
Coprimary end points at the 16 week mark were EASI-75 and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 with at least a 2-point improvement from baseline.¹
What Efficacy Did Telikibart Show at Weeks 16 and 52?
At Week 16, 69.6% of patients receiving telikibart achieved EASI-75 compared with 22.5% receiving placebo (difference, 47.1%; 95% CI, 38.62-55.50; P < .0001). IGA 0/1 response reached 33.1% versus 6.6% (difference, 26.5%; 95% CI, 19.86-33.15; P < .0001).¹
Telikibart also outperformed placebo on EASI-90, a reduction of at least 4 points in weekly average Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score, and least squares mean improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index (all P < .0001).¹
Responses deepened during maintenance. At the 52-week mark, EASI-75 rates were 94.3% among patients treated with telikibart throughout and 95.9% among those switched from placebo. IGA 0/1 rates reached 65.4% and 58.5%, and itch improvement of at least 4 points was achieved by 76.0% and 76.7%, respectively.¹
Did Telikibart Work Across Patient Subgroups?
Prespecified subgroup analyses showed higher Week 16 EASI-75 rates with telikibart versus placebo in every subgroup assessed (all P < .01). This included patients previously treated with other IL-4Rα inhibitors and those with prior immunosuppressant exposure. The investigators cited these findings as further support for the consistency of telikibart's treatment effect.¹
What Safety Findings Were Reported?
During the 16-week double-blind period, treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 64.5% of the telikibart group and 57.6% of the placebo group. Across the full study, 82.2% of patients receiving at least 1 dose of telikibart experienced an adverse event, most rated grade 1 or 2 by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.¹
The abstract did not identify which adverse events were most common or report rates of serious events or discontinuations.
Week 52 results reflect open-label treatment in both groups, so they were not compared statistically, and the abstract did not describe how missing data were handled or how many patients completed the study. Because the trial enrolled only adults at centers in China, findings may not extend to adolescents or other populations.
Editor’s note: This summary has been edited for grammar and clarity using artificial intelligence tools.
References
Wang S, Wu L, Li Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of telikibart, a novel anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody, for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: 52-week outcomes and prespecified subgroup analyses from a randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Abstract LB-120. Presented at: 2026 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Congress; September 30-October 3, 2026; Vienna, Austria.
Telikibart (GR1802) in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06216392. Accessed October 3, 2026. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06216392.