On February 2, 2026, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accepted the resubmission of the Biologics License Application (BLA) for relabotulinumtoxinA for the temporary improvement of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines (frown lines) and lateral canthal lines (crow’s feet) in adults, signaling a potential new neuromodulator option in aesthetic dermatology.1
This regulatory milestone follows a prior Complete Response Letter (CRL) that identified manufacturing-related deficiencies and reflects FDA acknowledgment that Galderma has addressed those chemistry, manufacturing, and control (CMC) issues.¹
The relabotulinumtoxinA submission is supported chiefly by the READY (RElabotulinumtoxin Aesthetic Development StudY) clinical program, a series of 4 phase III trials involving more than 1,900 participants evaluating efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe facial dynamic rhytides.¹ The READY-1 trial, published in Aesthetic Surgery Journal, showed statistically significant improvements in glabellar line severity compared with placebo at 1 month with a favorable safety profile and persistent effects up to 6 months.¹
Trial Overview
READY-1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study enrolling approximately 297 adults with moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. RelabotulinumtoxinA demonstrated a significantly higher composite ≥2-grade improvement at 1 month versus placebo (82.9% vs 0%; P<.001), with investigator-reported none or mild severity in 96.3% versus 4.5% of patients (P<.001) and median duration of effect extending beyond 24 weeks.¹ Onset of action was observed by Day 1 in 39% of participants, and treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs) were low (3.6%) and predominantly mild.¹ Additional phase 3 READY trials (READY-2 for lateral canthal lines, READY-3 evaluating simultaneous treatment, and READY-4 assessing long-term safety) reported similar efficacy and durability results in company disclosures, albeit unpublished in peer-reviewed literature.1-4
Key limitations in the current evidence base include the lack of published randomized data for lateral canthal lines comparable to READY-1’s glabellar results and the absence of large, independent comparative studies against other toxin formulations. Further, the generalizability of trial populations to broader clinical practice warrants evaluation, as aesthetic trial participants are often highly selected.