PGI-S cough improved by −0.8 in both the 27-mg (P =.0380) and 54-mg (P =.0057) groups at week 2, and the −0.6 change with 108 mg did not reach significance (P =.1683).¹ Improvements across all 3 measures persisted through week 6 in the 54-mg and 108-mg groups.
At week 6, the 54-mg group showed changes of −3.17 in CS-NRS (P =.0065), −43.07% in the E-RS:IPF cough subscale (P =.0041), and −1.0 in PGI-S cough (P =.0068).¹ Corresponding week 6 changes in the 108-mg group were −3.00 (P =.0144), −42.35% (P =.0047), and −0.9 (P =.0237).¹
“Patients began to see benefit right after a week on therapy,” said Molyneaux. “They felt their cough was less frequent… [and] less severe.”
Molyneaux noted objective cough counts and patient perception often diverge. Some patients reporting no cough register 20 to 30 coughs per hour on a 24-hour recorder, and others reporting severe cough register very few. He said objective counts confirm a treatment effect, and patient-reported outcomes show what the change means to the patient.
Nalbuphine ER Dosing and Phase 3 Trial Design in IPF Cough
Key Takeaways
- Nalbuphine ER improved patient-reported cough severity within 1 week and cough frequency within 2 weeks in patients with IPF.
- At week 6, the 54-mg dose reduced CS-NRS by 3.17 points (P =.0065) and E-RS:IPF cough scores by 43.07% (P =.0041).
- The 108-mg dose did not clearly outperform 54 mg on patient-reported outcomes; 54 mg twice daily is advancing to phase 3.
The 108-mg dose did not clearly outperform 54 mg on patient-reported outcomes. Molyneaux said the reason is not fully understood and may reflect a maximal dose effect. Both doses appeared effective, and investigators have carried 54 mg twice daily into the phase 3 program, which has begun recruiting.
In the primary CORAL analysis, titration-related adverse events such as nausea were common in the nalbuphine ER groups.3 Serious adverse events occurred in 1.6% of patients across the combined nalbuphine ER groups and in 10% of patients receiving placebo, with no fatal events.
On prescribing an opioid-class agent, Molyneaux said clinicians already use off-label options, including gabapentin and morphine, for cough in IPF without a substantial evidence base. He noted drug dependency studies of nalbuphine have been conducted. In his view, randomized data on efficacy and safety should support adoption if the agent is approved.
He acknowledged 6 weeks is a short window for a chronic disease. The phase 3 trials will use objective cough count at week 24 as the primary endpoint, with CS-NRS and patient-reported cough frequency as secondary measures. Patients will remain on treatment for 52 weeks to generate longer-term safety data.
“Looking at patients' perception of their cough severity…[and] cough frequency…for a year…will give us enough safety data to help reassure everybody that the drug is not only effective but also safe,” Molyneaux said.
References
Molyneaux P, Mogulkoc Bishop NM, Gunen H, et al. Patient-reported outcomes show early and sustained improvement following nalbuphine extended-release in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis experiencing chronic cough. CHEST. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2026.07.2680. Presented at: CHEST 2026 Annual Meeting; October 18-21, 2026; Phoenix, AZ.
Molyneaux PL, Mogulkoc N, Gunen H, et al; CORAL Study Group. Oral nalbuphine in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis–associated cough: the CORAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2026;335(12):1050-1059. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.26179