
- May 31 2003
- Volume 10
- Issue 10
ARE YOU SEEING STARS?
Result:
A new study that puts mutualfund ratings under the microscopeconcludes that those 4- and 5-starratings may not be worth all thatmuch to the average investor. ThePace University study, whichtracked funds from 1995 through2000, uncovered so-so performancesfor highly rated funds whencompared with those in the middleof the bunch. Lower rated funds, onthe other hand, were likely to earntheir poor marks by slumping evenfurther. Funds use high ratings tomarket themselves, and investorstend to use the ratings when choosingfunds. Funds that earntop marks pull in more cash. Fundswith 4- and 5-star ratings fromMorningstar had net inflows of $80billion last year, while lower-ratedcounterparts had net outflows ofapproximately $108 billion.
Articles in this issue
about 18 years ago
Psychiatry in Finance Is a Sobering Thoughtabout 18 years ago
Add LTC Insurance to Your Estate Plansabout 18 years ago
Be a Guest at a Classic Hollywood Hotelabout 18 years ago
Get the Scoop on This Summer's US Openabout 18 years ago
Cinema Consults: TWO WEEKS NOTICEabout 18 years ago
In Memorium: Margaret Anderson (February 1, 1931-March 29, 2003)about 18 years ago
Incorporate Rules into Your Market Planabout 18 years ago
Don't Believe in Santa Claus Annuitiesabout 18 years ago
Weigh the Facts in Investing Tendenciesabout 18 years ago
When the Majority Agree, They're WrongRelated to this article








